Julie’s Story – A Case Study

Julie was a senior manager attending her first management team meeting in her new workplace. Twenty other managers were in the room, plus the executive members and the chief executive officer (CEO).

What surprised Julie the most was the total lack of discussion and feedback from the management team. A confident individual who had always been valued for her contributions in other organisations, Julie initially viewed the other managers as disengaged, disinterested, and (if she was honest) ineffective.

The CEO was charming and engaging, and the executive often sought the managers’ views during these meetings, but the management team rarely offered any thoughts or opinions.

It was a static workforce, with long-tenured individuals, and Julie thought they perhaps just needed to move on. As an energetic new member, Julie was keen to make a difference. She actively participated in the meetings sharing her thoughts and encouraging others to do so.

At times, Julie was sure she caught knowing looks from some of the long-termers. Smug looks that said, ‘Just wait. You’ll soon find out’.

It didn’t take Julie long to realise something was truly amiss. Well-meaning colleagues gave her a friendly warning that challenging the status quo in that workplace was akin to career suicide. And a long line of people had gone before her.

Julie shook off the negativity, confident in her ability to influence. Her skills were recognised, and she started to climb the corporate ladder. But that climb came to an abrupt halt when she spoke up to the executive about areas that required remediation if the organisation was to achieve its strategic objectives and re-engage the management group.

In hindsight, Julie told me the signs were obvious at that first meeting, but, as a natural optimist, she chose to ignore them. ‘The reason there was utter silence in those meetings is that it was not safe to speak up. It was a fear-based culture where the only thing you were expected to say was ‘Sounds great’, ‘I agree’, and ‘Yes, of course, you are awesome.’

She recalled that most of the executives did not want to discuss, collaborate, or be challenged on anything. It was a command/control environment.

The meetings were more about lip service and the appearance of collaboration than genuine efforts to innovate and work together with experienced and senior workforce members. Julie felt it was such a missed opportunity for that workplace.

Sound familiar? Julie’s case is not unique. I regularly see and hear of similar environments. The ability to contribute to discussions or challenge ideas or how things have always been done is absent from teams and workplaces that are psychologically unsafe.

“Psychologically safe workplaces value diverse thinking and invite contributions from all people.”

Psychologically safe workplaces value diverse thinking and invite contributions from all people. Unafraid to hear bad news, they are inclusive places to learn, where it is safe to contribute, offer your thoughts, solutions, and ideas and challenge the status quo.

Reach out for a chat to discuss Psychological Safety Workplace Training or Programs.

Tan x

Tanya Heaney-Voogt

Director & Principal Consultant
MBA, ICFACC, MAHRI, Dip Mgt, Dip Coaching, Prosci® Certified Change Practitioner
E: tanya@tanyaheaneyvoogt.com

Recent Blogs

The Risks of Fundamental Attribution Error in the Workplace

When we witness poor behaviours at work, we can make assumptions that it is the individual’s personality or disposition that caused the behaviour rather than take into consideration the situational factors. The situational factors include: The environment around us...

The Hidden Costs of Workplace Incivility

Ten years ago, incivility expert, Christine Porath, wrote in the Harvard Business Review that “rudeness at work is rampant and it’s on the rise.” In her research which included polling thousands of workers about how they’re treated on the job, Porath stated 98% of...

Challenging Safely

Challenging Safely requires a positive intent and care in the delivery.   Challenger safety, the final and most complex stage in the 4 Stages of Psychological Safety Framework by Timothy R. Clark,  always assumes a positive intent and care in the delivery. When...

Common Causes of Workplace Conflict

Many of these causes of conflict are interrelated.  At the end of the descriptors, there’s a coaching tool to use on yourself, with your team or implement across the workplace to address relationship breakdowns, tension or conflict.Change Change can be a catalyst for...

Inclusion – Getting to the Heart of Safe and Effective Teams

According to the Diversity Council of Australia (DCA), ‘Inclusion occurs when a diversity of people feel valued and respected, have access to opportunities and resources, and can contribute their perspectives and talents to improve their organisation.’ There’s a...

Commit No Nuisance

Do you have a list of organisational values that sit buried deep in the basement somewhere?  Or values that are talked about a lot but quite clearly not lived and no one is held accountable for the behaviours that sit under each of those (even if they are clearly...

The dual benefits of scanning for R.O.T. in your team

R.O.T.  is an acronym of tech origin that stands for redundant, obsolete, or trivial.   Timothy R Clark, social scientist, researcher, and author tells us it's important to look for R.O.T. as 'everything we do eventually becomes obsolete'.   Clark talks about this...

The most expensive words in business…

Want to know what the eight most expensive words in business are?   They might surprise you. I suspect you've heard them often, perhaps you've even uttered them yourself. They are:   "But we have always done it this way."It's a phrase guaranteed to get my...

What systems do you have in place for mitigating psychosocial hazards?

Psychosocial hazards are the things in the design, application and management of work that contribute to work-related stress.    Work-related stress in itself is not necessarily a problem. But when the stress is severe, prolonged or unmanaged, you increase the...

From 0 – Me in 60 Seconds

What's your default change response? Do you move from 0 - Me in 60 seconds? You're not alone. As part of our threat detection response during any perceived threat our amygdala kicks in and spirals us into a reactive state, rather than a constructive state. Put simply,...