Enough, Already

There will always be more good ideas than capacity to execute. How then does an organisation choose which ideas to resource and execute?

It’s no secret we’re all grappling with change saturation – in our lives right now and in the workplace.

Change is no longer considered a special event, but a constant. And whilst we are all told to embrace words such as change, respond, adapt, pivot (I’ve made a very good acronym from that) the constant saturation of initiatives comes at a cost.

To our success
To our productivity
To morale, and
To our mental wellbeing

Prosci – Global leaders in change research and education – define change saturation as something that ‘occurs when the number of changes being implemented exceeds the capacity of individuals in the organisation to effectively adopt and use those changes.’

The other cost we pay in a change saturated workplace is the cost of superficial implementation.

With compliance and framework overload, the risk is that a tick and flick superficial approach is applied, purely because of the number of initiatives and the lack of capacity to execute in a thorough and meaningful way.

The Gender Equality Act which came into effect in March 2021 is a perfect example of this. This Act is full of depth and very well-meaning, however the impost on our public entities and the change gap in many areas requires significant investment of resources to do this work in a way that will achieve meaningful change, rather than superficial compliance.

What then can Workplaces do?

Purely and simply, you need to rationalise your change initiatives.

Be wary of the shiny object syndrome and getting attracted to bright shiny new things to focus on, that take you away from core strategic activities or non-discretionary change projects.

Douglas B. Reeves, long-time educator, and author of more than 20 books, talks about the phenomenon in education of initiative fatigue and warns that each new initiative added to the pile creates a dramatic decline in organisational effectiveness¹.

Prosci supports this. Their research² shows that simultaneous change projects:

  • Increase fear and resistance
  • Lead to tangible customer impact; and
  • Increase the risk of losing valued employees.

Pull the Weeds before you Plant the Flowers

Greeves advises educators to pull the weeds before they plant the flowers ‘to avoid the new flowers being choked by the omnipresent weeds.’ In other words, make way for your new initiatives. Don’t overcrowd things.

In the workplace here’s five ways to pull the weeds:

  1. Make sure you are not being lured by bright shiny objects
  2. Make sure the change initiative is non-discretionary (you have to do this)
  3. Make sure the change initiative aligns to your strategic direction
  4. Make sure you fiercely rationalise activities to enable adequate focus on initiatives
  5. Sacrifice the “wants and nice to haves” to ensure the “must have” flowers can bloom

For the absence of doubt – change projects that seek to reduce psychological harm or lift psychological safety are non-discretionary.

That work is an enabler of your organisation’s productivity and a risk mitigation strategy. Don’t be tempted to see safety and culture as something you can whip from the garden bed.

For more guidance on managing change saturation see Avoiding Change Fatigue Blog and Project Rationalisation Register

If you’d like support implementing a change project, see how I can help you with the Cracking the Change Code Program

I look forward to working together!

Tan x

¹ Leading to Change / Pull the Weeds Before You Plant the Flowers – ASCD

²  Understanding Resistance – Prosci’s Flight and Risk Model

Tanya Heaney-Voogt

Director & Principal Consultant
MBA, ICFACC, MAHRI, Dip Mgt, Dip Coaching, Prosci® Certified Change Practitioner
E: tanya@tanyaheaneyvoogt.com

Recent Blogs

The Risks of Fundamental Attribution Error in the Workplace

When we witness poor behaviours at work, we can make assumptions that it is the individual’s personality or disposition that caused the behaviour rather than take into consideration the situational factors. The situational factors include: The environment around us...

The Hidden Costs of Workplace Incivility

Ten years ago, incivility expert, Christine Porath, wrote in the Harvard Business Review that “rudeness at work is rampant and it’s on the rise.” In her research which included polling thousands of workers about how they’re treated on the job, Porath stated 98% of...

Challenging Safely

Challenging Safely requires a positive intent and care in the delivery.   Challenger safety, the final and most complex stage in the 4 Stages of Psychological Safety Framework by Timothy R. Clark,  always assumes a positive intent and care in the delivery. When...

Common Causes of Workplace Conflict

Many of these causes of conflict are interrelated.  At the end of the descriptors, there’s a coaching tool to use on yourself, with your team or implement across the workplace to address relationship breakdowns, tension or conflict.Change Change can be a catalyst for...

Inclusion – Getting to the Heart of Safe and Effective Teams

According to the Diversity Council of Australia (DCA), ‘Inclusion occurs when a diversity of people feel valued and respected, have access to opportunities and resources, and can contribute their perspectives and talents to improve their organisation.’ There’s a...

Commit No Nuisance

Do you have a list of organisational values that sit buried deep in the basement somewhere?  Or values that are talked about a lot but quite clearly not lived and no one is held accountable for the behaviours that sit under each of those (even if they are clearly...

The dual benefits of scanning for R.O.T. in your team

R.O.T.  is an acronym of tech origin that stands for redundant, obsolete, or trivial.   Timothy R Clark, social scientist, researcher, and author tells us it's important to look for R.O.T. as 'everything we do eventually becomes obsolete'.   Clark talks about this...

It didn’t take long for Julie to realise something was truly amiss

Julie's Story - A Case Study Julie was a senior manager attending her first management team meeting in her new workplace. Twenty other managers were in the room, plus the executive members and the chief executive officer (CEO). What surprised Julie the most was the...

The most expensive words in business…

Want to know what the eight most expensive words in business are?   They might surprise you. I suspect you've heard them often, perhaps you've even uttered them yourself. They are:   "But we have always done it this way."It's a phrase guaranteed to get my...

What systems do you have in place for mitigating psychosocial hazards?

Psychosocial hazards are the things in the design, application and management of work that contribute to work-related stress.    Work-related stress in itself is not necessarily a problem. But when the stress is severe, prolonged or unmanaged, you increase the...